nextclade 1.2.3 (new formula)#1394
Conversation
|
The CI error |
|
@corneliusroemer Can you rebase this on the current develop? |
ff0ca98 to
3a3256b
Compare
|
@eseiler Done! Someone needs to approve running workflows though, unfortunately. Maybe @sjackman @YoshitakaMo @jonchang @zbeekman? Not sure who has the rights. |
|
I've started CI checks on this. Note that you could probably just submit this to homebrew/core instead, as long as you provide a better test in the |
|
Try |
|
When I try to build it locally in an Ubuntu docker image using Not sure what's the problem since I can build it without brew just using Any ideas? |
You're likely using a different compiler from your host environment than brew's compiler. It is likely an issue in this dependency when compiling with gcc 11. |
|
Thanks! I didn't find that bug. So I would have to tell brew that all but gcc 9 works - or at least that gcc@11 doesn't. |
|
Yes, you'll need to add a I also want to reiterate that you should submit this to https://github.com/homebrew/homebrew-core, since the CI resources there are better (including for ARM macOS) and that repository gets more visibility than this one. |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
brew install --build-from-source FORMULA, whereFORMULAis the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict FORMULA(after doingbrew install FORMULA)?This is my first foray into packaging with brew. Feedback welcome!